Thailand Rejection of evidence in case Somchai Neelapaijit
On 21 May 2014, the Supreme Court of Thailand rejected the admission of crucial phone evidence in the case against five police officers accused of causing the involuntary disappearance of the Thai lawyer Somchai Neelapaijit to enforced disappearance in Bangkok on 12 March 2004. Several international organisations stated that this decision essentially shuts down this phase of the 10-year-old case.
Neelapaijit defended suspects of terrorism in the turbulent south of Thailand. He disappeared on 12 March 2004, shortly after having publicly accused the police of torturing his clients in prison. His car was found empty. Nothing has been heard of him since.
Shortly after Somchai’s disappearance, five police officers were arrested and prosecuted for their alleged involvement in the disappearance. On 8 and 29 April 2004, the Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for the five police officers for their alleged participation in robbing Somchai Neelapaijit and forcing him into a vehicle, charging the officers with coercion and gang-robbery. However, the judgment on appeal, on 11 March 2011, confirmed that the Thai authorities are as yet unable to answer the question of who was responsible for Somchai’s disappearance. The Court therefore acquitted all of the five suspects. It also ruled that Somchai’s wife, Angkhana Neelapaijit, and their children were not eligible to exercise their rights as an aggrieved party and, in that capacity, to uncover the truth of this matter. On 10 May 2011, Angkhana Neelapaijit appealed to the Supreme Court both the decision on her family’s standing and the substantive issues in the case, requesting it to consider further evidence.
L4L is concerned with this recent rejection of evidence, even more since the Thai Delegation gave assurances in a statement to the Convention Against Torture Committee in Geneva in April 2014, that the Department of Special Investigations (DSI) was continuing to investigate Somchai Neelapaijit’s case without any interference. L4L calls on the Thai authorities to promptly and effectively investigate the case of Somchai Neelapaijit and to bring the perpetrators to justice.
Meer nieuws uit
Joint letter on the independence of the legal profession in Eswatini
In a joint letter Lawyers for Lawyers and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) express concern about proposed legislation to regulate the operations and functions of the legal profession in Eswatini that would severely undermine the right to an independentLees verder
Nasrin Sotoudeh transferred to Gharchak Prison
Nasrin Sotoudeh has been moved to the notorious Gharchack Prison in the city of Varamin on 20 October 2020, despite serious medical issues that require her hospitalization. This has been reported by Center for Human Rights in Iran. Ms. SotoudehLees verder
Letter on the judicial harassment of Levent Pişkin
In a letter to the Turkish authorities Lawyers for Lawyers expressed concern about the legal proceedings initiated against prominent human rights lawyer and defender Levent Pişkin. The final hearing in his court case will be held on 18 November 2020.Lees verder