Update UPR China & Hong Kong – L4L delegation in Geneva
30 March 2024

Update UPR China & Hong Kong – L4L delegation in Geneva

China

On 23 January 2024, the session for the fourth Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of China, including Hong Kong, was held at the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva. Lawyers for Lawyers jointly submitted a report for this UPR and sent a delegation to the UPR pre-sessions that took place in November 2023 in Geneva. During the UPR session, several states explicitly mentioned the situation of lawyers in their recommendations and advance questions to China, highlighting the urgent and dire situation of lawyers.  

The key concern highlighted in Lawyers for Lawyers’ joint report for the UPR is China’s compliance with its international human rights obligations under the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers. This notably pertains to the prosecution, imposition of disciplinary measures, and harassment faced by lawyers, along with their restriction of freedom of expression, including the restriction on the rights of lawyers in Hong Kong.   

During the UPR pre-sessions, The 29 Principles – the NGO with which Lawyers for Lawyers jointly submitted its report – gave a presentation to a large number of state representatives expressing our collective concerns about the dire situation of lawyers in China and Hong Kong.    

After the UPR pre-sessions, the Lawyers for Lawyers delegation raised their specific concerns regarding the deteriorating situation of lawyers in China and Hong Kong with state delegates during a retreat organized by the International Service for Human Rights between several NGOs and over 20 country delegations. Apart from explaining the most pressing issues, Lawyers for Lawyers urged the state delegates to explicitly address the situation of lawyers in their recommendations to China.  

During the UPR session itself, five states expressly mentioned lawyers in their advance questions submitted to China. Three states gave a list of names of detained human rights defenders that included human rights lawyers, asking for the justification for their detention consistent with human rights law, the steps being taken to protect them from a list of violations, and their location and status. The Chinese delegation avoided answering or properly responding to any of these questions. Furthermore, seven states mentioned lawyers explicitly in their recommendations to China during the UPR session. Asian Lawyers Network has written an extensive article on, among other things, the advanced questions and recommendations relating to lawyers. 

Meer nieuws uit China

24 April 2024

UN Special rapporteur condemns China’s targeting of human rights lawyers in letter to the government

China

The UN Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Margaret Satterthwaite, issued a detailed letter on February 14, 2024, addressing the People’s Republic of China about severe restrictions on human rights lawyers. Recently made public, this letter exposes

Lees verder
17 April 2024

Joint statement on the detention of Chinese human rights lawyer Yu Wensheng and his wife, activist Xu Yan

China

Lawyers for Lawyers and 29 other civil society organisations have issued a joint statement expressing their grave concern regarding the detention of human rights lawyer Yu Wensheng and his wife, activist Xu Yan. 13 April marks the first anniversary of

Lees verder
28 March 2024

Hong Kong’s new security laws: a crushing blow to freedom

China

The recent enactment of draconian security laws in Hong Kong has sent shockwaves throughout the international community. Human rights organisations and the United Nations have vehemently condemned these laws, recognising them as a serious erosion of the freedoms once promised

Lees verder
11 November 2023

Li Yuhan received a 6.5-Year verdict amid health struggles.

China

On October 25, 2023, the Heping District Court in Shenyang, Liaoning Province, pronounced human rights lawyer Li Yuhan guilty of charges including “picking quarrels and provoking trouble” and “fraud.” She was subsequently sentenced to 6.5 years in prison. Affectionately referred

Lees verder