Myanmar, Colombia, China: joint oral statement during the id on the UPR
On 1 October, Lawyers for Lawyers Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada, the Law Society of England and Wales, the International Commission of Jurists, the International Service for Human Rights, and the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute delivered an oral statement during the interactive dialogue on the Universal Period Review. The dialogue took place during the 48th session of the UN Human Rights Council.
The statement reads as follows:
This is a joint statement of several NGOs.
We regret that the military coup in Myanmar has precluded an Interactive Dialogue on its UPR outcome for two consecutive Council sessions. Meanwhile, lawyers and defenders continue to be at risk, and a number have been arbitrarily detained, disappeared, and ill-treated by the junta.
Mid-term assessment after Colombia’s 2018 UPR shows lack of progress in implementing the recommendations it accepted on protection of lawyers. Lawyers and defenders continue to be in danger in Colombia, and protection measures remain inadequate.
China has not implemented recommendations accepted during its 2018 UPR. Mid-term assessment demonstrates that China continues to persecute lawyers and defenders without improvement in freedom of expression or fair trial rights. Lawyer Chang Weiping recently reported torture and ill-treatment during months of arbitrary detention without access to a lawyer. China is not fulfilling its responsibilities as a member of this Council to “uphold the highest standards of human rights” pursuant to GA resolution 60/251.
The UPR is a peer review. Meaningful, genuine engagement with the UPR process is critical to its effectiveness. We urge all States under Review, Troikas and Recommending States, to monitor and ensure implementation of all accepted recommendations, and comply with resolution 60/251.
 Lawyers for Lawyers and Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada, Joint Submission to the United Nations Universal Periodic Review, June 2020, available at: https://lawyersforlawyers.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Joint-UPR-submission-Myanmar-L4L-LRWC-July-2020.pdf.
 Lawyers for Lawyers, Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada, and The Colombian Caravana, Colombia: Mid-term Report – Review of the implementation of recommendations with respect to the rule of law and the role of human rights defenders accepted by Colombia during the UPR in 2018, September 2021, available at: https://lawyersforlawyers.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Midterm-report-Colombia-L4L-LRWC-Caravana-sept-2021.pdf.
 Lawyers for Lawyers, Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada, China: Mid-term Report – Review of the implementation of recommendations with respect to the rule of law and the role of human rights defenders accepted by China during the UPR in 2018, August 2021, available at: https://lawyersforlawyers.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Final-mid-term-review-China-L4L-LRWC.pdf.
 Front Line Defenders, “Chang Weiping allowed first meeting with lawyers, recounts ill-treatment,” 16 September 2021, available at: https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/case/chang-weiping-allowed-first-meeting-lawyers-recounts-ill-treatment.
 Universal Rights Group, “Towards the Third Cycle of the UPR: Stick or Twist? Lessons learnt from the first ten years of the Universal Periodic Review.” Policy Report, July 2016, available at: https://www.universal-rights.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/URG_UPR_stick_or_twist_page_by_page.pdf
Dag van de Bedreigde Advocaat – Afghanistan
24 januari 2021 is de jaarlijkse ‘Dag van de Bedreigde Advocaat’. Dit jaar staat de dag in het teken van advocaten uit Afghanistan die vanwege hun legitieme werkzaamheden in de problemen komen. In het kader van deze dag worden op dinsdagLees verder
Chinese New Year: Looking back on another year of repression of China’s legal professionals
Today, 22 January, marks the start of the Chinese New Year and the start of the Spring Festival. Hopefully, the start of the Year of the Rabbit will bring a better tide for China’s human rights lawyers compared to theLees verder
Letter to the Lawyers Council of Thailand on the disbarment proceedings against Arnon Nampha
Lawyers for Lawyers again expressed concerns about the disbarment proceedings against lawyer and human rights defender Mr. Arnon Nampha. Lawyers for Lawyers is concerned about the disbarment proceeding against Mr. Arnon Nampha, a lawyer and human rights defender, that isLees verder