Joint letter on revocation licenses of Aliaksandr Pylchanka and Yulia Levanchuk
3 November 2020

Joint letter on revocation licenses of Aliaksandr Pylchanka and Yulia Levanchuk

Belarus

In a joint letter Lawyers for Lawyers and the Law Society of England and Wales have expressed concerns about the revocation of the licenses to practise law of the Belarus lawyers Aliaksandr Pylchanka and Yulia Levanchuk on 15 October 2020.

Mr. Pylchanka represents detained opposition leaders Viktar Babaryka and Maria Kalesnikava. The decision to revoke his license by the Qualification Commission for legal practice in the Republic of Belarus on 15 October 2020 was based on his alleged involvement in “the commission of a misdemeanour incompatible with the title of lawyer”, namely “the commission of actions discrediting the bar”. We were informed that the evidence against him included an interview he gave which was published on the TUT.BY internet portal on 14 August 2020. In the interview, Mr. Pylchanka commented on what actions should be taken by law enforcement officials and the judicial system in Belarus following the use of violence against civilians by law enforcement officers .

Ms. Levanchuk represents Maksim Kharoshyn, the owner of a flower shop in Minsk who handed out flowers to protesters. After his detention on 13 October 2020, Maksim Kharoshyn was so badly beaten that he had to be hospitalized. We have been informed that the justification given for revoking Ms. Levanchuk’s license to practice law is connected to allegedly using threats in her online conversation with the investigator in charge of her client’s case.

According to our information, both Mr. Pylchanka and Ms. Levanchuk have denied the charges against them and are in the process of appealing the decision to revoke their licenses.

We believe that the revocation of the licenses of these two lawyers is related to their professional activities and constitutes improper interference with such activities. Lawyers for Lawyers and the Law Society have both raised concerns about the threats to the independence of the legal profession and access to justice in the aftermath of the recent elections in Belarus.

Lawyers for Lawyers and the Law Society urge the relevant authorities in Belarus to review and reverse the decisions revoking the licenses of Mr. Pylchenka and Ms. Levanchuk, abstain from any further measures that would constitute improper interference with their professional activities, and guarantee that all lawyers in Belarus, including Ms. Pylchanka and Mr Levanchuk, are able to practice law without threat, intimidation, hindrance, harassment, improper interference or reprisals.

 

Meer nieuws uit Belarus

16 April 2024

‘Flight to Lithuania’ — interview with Natalia Matskevich and Paulius Griciunas

Belarus

A new law has been passed in Lithuania which allows lawyers from outside the European Union to register as third-party lawyers in Lithuania. This legislative advance is of great symbolic importance according to Belarusian lawyer Natalia Matskevich. By Trudeke Sillevis

Lees verder
21 March 2024

Joint oral statement to Human Rights Council on Belarus

Belarus

On 19 March 2024, Lawyers for Lawyers, the Law Society of England and Wales, and the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute delivered an oral statement during the interactive dialogue on the interim oral update of the High Commissioner on the situation of

Lees verder
7 February 2024

Report on Belarus: The Crisis of the Legal Profession Continued Repressions 2022 – 2023

Belarus

In cooperation with the American Bar Association (ABA) and the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI), the Center for Constitutionalism and Human Rights, Right to Defense, and Lawyers for Lawyers have prepared this report to summarize the ongoing worrying

Lees verder
30 December 2023

Tortured and unlawfully imprisoned: Lawyers for Lawyers demands justice for Maksim Znak

Belarus

Lawyers for Lawyers joins the campaign to demand an end to the torture of Maksim Znak, a Belarusian lawyer who was arbitrarily detained in 2020. He was ultimately sentenced to 10 years in prison for carrying out his professional activities

Lees verder