Contempt proceedings against Charles Hector
It has been reported that the Malaysian lawyer and human rights defender Charles Hector potentially faces contempt of court charges. These potential charges are in relation to a letter he sent to an officer of the Jerantut District Forestry Office in the context of his trial preparation for a civil lawsuit against two companies which conduct logging activities in the Jerantut Tambahan Forest Reserve.
Charles Hector represents eight inhabitants of Kampung Baharu, a village in Jerantut, Pahang. The eight villagers are few of many who protests against the logging, as the villagers are highly depended on the forest reserve for clean water and their livelihoods. To stop the protests, the two logging companies filed a writ of summons against the eight villagers in the Kuantan High Court. The writ consisted of an application for an injunction order to stop the defendants from preventing the companies’ workers from carrying out their activities and to stop spreading alleged false information. On November 5, 2020, the injunction order was granted by the Kuantan High Court.
After the Court granted the injunction order, Charles Hector sent – for the purpose of trial preparations – a letter on behalf of his clients to an officer of the Jerantut District Forestry Office to seek clarification on a letter send by that office on February 20, 2021. The logging companies claim that the Charles Hector’s letter violated the injunction order and therefore, filed an ex parte application for leave to commence contempt of court proceedings against the human rights lawyer and his eight clients.
Today, the hearing before the Kuantan High Court takes place in the logging companies’ ex parte application for leave to commence contempt of court proceedings against Charles Hector and the eight villagers. In an open letter distributed by Legal Action for Women, different lawyers and international organizations stated that it is alarming that the Court is even hearing this ex parte application that clearly aims to preclude a fair legal process by attacking and discrediting the human rights lawyer Charles Hector.
Malaysia’s contempt of court doctrine has reportedly led to abuses before. The Malaysian Bar raised concerns about the legal doctrine of contempt of court, as its basis can solely be found in a common law doctrine and is thus, not statutorily codified. Amnesty International states that this has led to a vague legal concept and sentences which are arbitrary and disproportionate. The Malaysian Bar recommended reform of the law of contempt by codifying it statutorily in order to have a clear and unequivocal legal concept.
Meer nieuws uit Malaysia
Malaysia: UPR mid-term report
In preparation of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Malaysia in 2023, Lawyers for Lawyers has written a mid-term report. In this report, we set out to what extent Malaysia has implemented the recommendations it partially accepted during the 2018 UPR processLees verder
Contempt of court action against Charles Hector withdrawn
On 6 April 2021, Lawyers for Lawyers reported that the Malaysian lawyer and human rights defender Charles Hector potentially faced contempt of court charges. According to the information received, the contempt proceedings against Charles Hector were withdrawn by the twoLees verder
Siti Kasim acquitted
On 21 August 2020 Malysian lawyer Siti Kasim was acquitted for obstructing a civil servant during the Federal Territories Islamic Department (JAWI) raid on a private event held by the transgender community in 2016. Siti Kasim, a lawyer and human rightsLees verder
UPR submission Malaysia
In March 2018, Lawyers for Lawyers submitted a report for the Universal Periodic Review of Malaysia. This review will take place in November 2018. In the report, Lawyers for Lawyers highlighted that the Malaysian authorities do not always uphold the necessaryLees verder